Build Philly Now

Room to Grow

The Parker bills are a great start. Here's how we can level up the impact.

The Gap

We scored 6 cities on transit-oriented zoning strength. Philadelphia ranks last.

Every peer city that has adopted transit-oriented zoning goes further than the Parker bill on parking, height, density, and geographic coverage. Philadelphia’s proposal covers fewer stations, offers a smaller FAR bonus, and retains parking minimums that no other city still requires near transit.

Peer city comparison chart showing Philadelphia ranks last among 6 cities
CityParkingHeightFAR/DensityCoverage
Seattle, WANo minimums citywideUnlimited in urban centers75% density bonus w/ affordabilityCitywide (all frequent transit)
Chicago, ILNo minimums near transitNo TOD-specific caps50% FAR bonus½ mile around all CTA stations
Austin, TXNo minimums citywide60 ft near transitCompatibility standards relaxed¼ mile around transit stops
Baltimore, MDNo minimums in TOD zones65 ft in transit zonesDensity doubled in TOD½ mile around rail stations
Prince George's Co., MD50% reduction near transit150 ft in activity centersUp to 8.0 FAR in activity centers½ mile around Metro stations
Philadelphia (Parker)50% reduction (not elimination)45 ft (CMX-1/2, RM-1 only)30% FAR bonus¼ mile, 13 MFL stations only

Fix the Bonus

The 30% FAR bonus brings buildings to 9 stories — the range the construction cost study flags as least efficient.

A landmark study by Eriksen & Orlando (Real Estate Economics, 2022) shows that in 24 of the 50 largest US cities, unconstrained developers build exactly 7 stories. At 8 stories, construction costs jump 32% due to the shift from wood-frame to steel/concrete. The 30% bonus (500% × 1.3 = 650% FAR) adds about two floors, bringing buildings to 9 stories — the range the study identifies as least cost-efficient.

32%
Cost jump at 8 stories
Type I construction threshold
7 stories
Optimal height (wood)
Lowest break-even rent at $18.69/sqft
$22.85/sqft
Break-even rent at 12 stories
Only viable with sufficient FAR
24 of 50
Cities building exactly 7 stories
Largest US cities, when unconstrained

Construction Cost / sqft

Four Massing Scenarios

Base Zoning

Current Code
Massing: Base Zoning at 500% FAR
500%FAR · 7 stories

Current CMX-3 zoning allows 500% FAR with 75% lot coverage. This maxes out at 7 stories — the sweet spot for Type III/IV wood-frame construction. Most efficient construction type with lowest per-unit costs.

Parker TOC Bill

Bill 260517
Massing: Parker TOC Bill at 650% FAR
650%FAR · 9 stories

The 30% bonus is calculated on the base FAR (500% × 1.3 = 650%), adding +150% FAR — about two floors — to reach 9 stories. The cost study finds 8-9 stories is where returns are weakest: it requires Type I (steel/concrete) construction and its ~32% higher cost, while adding only modest floor area, so the added capacity is hard to build economically.

Transit Improvements Bonus

Bill 260518
Massing: Transit Improvements Bonus at 700% FAR
700%FAR · ~10 stories

Bill 260518 doubles the transit-improvements bonus (§14-702(8)) for CMX-3 within /TOC from 100% to 200%, reaching 700% FAR (~10 stories) — rising past the steepest part of the cost cliff. This is an earned bonus: a developer claims it by spending a set share of hard costs on transit improvements. It adds no by-right capacity, and at 700% it's still short of the ~800% where Type I steel/concrete typically becomes economical on its own.

Cumulative Bonus Stacking

Recommended
Massing: Cumulative Bonus Stacking at 950% FAR
950%FAR · 12+ stories

Stacking the doubled transit-improvements bonus (200%, Bill 260518) and the mixed-income bonus (250%, §14-702(7)) on the 500% base reaches 950% FAR. At 12+ stories with 80% lot coverage, the building clears the cost cliff and becomes economical again — but only if the developer earns both contingent bonuses. The by-right path stops short of that.

The Cost Cliff

At 650% FAR, buildings reach 9 stories, which requires Type I steel/concrete construction — about 32% more per square foot — while adding only about two floors over the 7-story wood-frame optimum. The economics are strongest either at 7 stories (wood frame) or at 12+ stories, where added floor area offsets the higher cost. The 8-9 story range in between is where the cost study finds the weakest returns.

Add More Stations

The Parker bill covers 13 MFL stations. Philadelphia has 38 more worth including.

Six transit corridors — the Broad Street Line, Girard Ave trolley, regional rail, and MFL gap stations — capture 10,832 additional eligible parcels across 38 new stations. Combined with the Parker bill, these corridors produce 32,164 realistic housing units — 3.6x what the Parker bill delivers alone.

13
MFL Stations
In Parker bill
38
Additional Stations
6 corridors
32,164
Combined Realistic Units
All corridors
3.6x
Multiplier vs Parker
Pre-MIN realistic
CorridorStationsParcelsNear-termRealisticWith MIN
Girard Ave (Rt 15 Trolley + BSL)113,5239,6507,8867,765
North Broad BSL112,1468,7907,1997,199
Complete MFL (Fill Gaps)52,3465,4994,7584,179
South Broad BSL61,3771,8621,5361,536
West Philadelphia RR31,3701,6331,5211,484
Chelten/Germantown RR270232231231

The Stations We Want Added

Six corridors, 38 stations. We are asking each District Council Member to introduce companion amendments adding the stations in their district. Each card shows the corridor’s realistic near-term housing yield and the individual stations within it.

Girard Ave (Rt 15 Trolley + BSL)

11 stations
+7,886realistic units
  • Girard & Front St+565
  • Girard & 2nd St+1,364
  • Girard & 5th St+2,136
  • Girard & 8th St+747
  • Girard BSL+464
  • Girard & 16th St+748
  • Girard & 17th St+605
  • Girard & 33rd St+87
  • Girard & 39th St+171
  • Girard & 51st St+675
  • Girard & 52nd St+324

North Broad BSL

11 stations
+7,199realistic units
  • Temple University BSL+332
  • Cecil B Moore BSL+26
  • Susquehanna-Dauphin BSL+811
  • North Philadelphia Amtrak+2,529
  • Erie BSL+935
  • Hunting Park BSL+446
  • Wayne Junction RR+213
  • Logan BSL+281
  • Wyoming BSL+1,578
  • Olney TC BSL+48
  • Fern Rock TC BSL

Complete MFL (Fill Gaps)

5 stations
+4,758realistic units
  • Girard MFL+2,004
  • York-Dauphin+1,203
  • Church+435
  • Margaret-Orthodox+452
  • Arrott TC+664

South Broad BSL

6 stations
+1,536realistic units
  • Ellsworth-Federal BSL+937
  • Tasker-Morris BSL+91
  • Snyder BSL+193
  • Oregon BSL+265
  • AT&T Station BSL+50
  • NRG Station BSL

West Philadelphia RR

3 stations
+1,521realistic units
  • 30th Street Station+244
  • 49th Street RR+153
  • Overbrook RR+1,124

Chelten/Germantown RR

2 stations
+231realistic units
  • Chelten Avenue RR
  • Germantown RR+231

Parker Alone vs. Combined

Eliminate Parking Minimums

Parking requirements consume floor area within a fixed height envelope, killing housing units.

In a 38-foot building — the maximum in most residential districts — requiring ground-floor parking eliminates an entire residential floor. Each parking space consumes roughly 350 sqft including drive aisles. Across all TOC-eligible parcels, current parking minimums destroy 10,545 housing units that could otherwise be built.

10,545
Units Lost to Parking
Current law, all corridors
882
Parcels Constrained
Where parking binds
9.5%
Binding Rate
Share of parcels parking-bound

Units Lost to Parking by Scenario

Parking Rates by District (Zoning Code \u00a714-804)

1 space/unit: RM-3, RM-4, RSA-1, RSA-2, RSA-3, RTA-1
0.5 space/unit: RM-2
0.3 space/unit: CMX-3
No requirement: RM-1, CMX-1, CMX-2, CMX-2.5, CMX-4, CMX-5

The Parker bill reduces these by 50% but does not eliminate them. A 10-unit building in RSA-3 would still need 5 parking spaces — consuming 1,750 sqft that could hold 2 additional units.

The Full Picture

Each reform builds on the last. Together they transform the TOC overlay from modest to meaningful.

The Parker bill as introduced delivers an estimated 7,745 housing units. Five complementary reforms — funding or repealing the MIN overlay, fixing the construction cost cliff, expanding to 6 transit corridors, and eliminating parking minimums — bring the total to 45,479 units.

Cumulative Housing Yield by Reform

Each bar shows the individual policy contribution. Running total shown above each bar.

TOC baseline
Remove restrictions
Expand coverage
All estimates use conservative soft-site methodology with assessed market values.
ReformUnits AddedRunning Total
Parker TOC (as introduced)+7,7457,745
Fund or Repeal MIN+2,57510,320
Remove Cost Cliff+1,48311,803
6-Corridor Expansion+23,13134,934
Eliminate Parking Min.+10,54545,479

Pass the Bills. Add the Stations. End the Parking Minimums.

The TOC bills are a credible start. Council can make them meaningful by adding stations across all six corridors and eliminating parking minimums in the TOC overlay.

See Your District